Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Madhav Govind Dhulshete Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT APPEAL (L) No. 2128 OF 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/10/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Madhav Govind Dhulshete Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)

Section 40A is inserted in Income Tax Act with an aim and object to discourage payment of money in cash beyond a certain limit. That is to encourage cheque transactions and banking operations. Thus, in these circumstances, Assessing Officer is correct in making disallowance of  Rs. 36,16,500 out of the total consideration of Rs. 39,00,960 as substantial sum has been paid in cash even though banking channels are available to both, the Assessee as well as the stockist.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1. By this Appeal, the Assessee is challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench at Pune.

2. The Assessment year is 2009-2010.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031