Case Law Details
Singh Tyres Vs State Of U.P. And Another (Allahabad High Court)
From perusal of the record, we find that the goods were transported from one place to another within the State of U.P. and were accompanied by the requisite documents and requisite E-Way Bill has also been produced by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2 before the date fixed for reply. In view of the aforesaid fact, we have no other option but to allow the present writ petition and to quash the seizure order as well as consequential notice issued under Section 129(3) of the Act.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT
Heard Sri Amit Mahajan and Sri Niraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special counsel for the State respondents.
The petitioner is a registered proprietorship firm and is engaged in trading of various kind of tyres and tubes. The petitioner has purchased tyres and tubes from Apollo Tyres Ltd., Kanpur (U.P.).
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
