Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Smt. Veena Gope Shroff (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal no. 71 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Merely stating that the tax effect was low in an earlier order resulting in not filing of an appeal across the bar, without the same being specifically put in affidavit or in the appeal memo cannot be accepted. This manner of filing of appeals enables the revenue to pick and choose orders from which appeals are preferred and from which the appeals are not preferred rendering to a naught equal application of law on all.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2013
Commissioner of Income Tax
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
right view of the hon court. seems revenue suffers from ego as if it is master advocate in law. sorry revenue it shows how lop sided is your thinking process. honor court or tribunal orders after all tribunal and court do not decide haphazardly decide cases . take note, else revenue would become a laughing stock, like the lad grabbing state laws, hon SC pulled up the union government as also state laws if you read in Noida development authority matter…it warned desist from grabbing lands from poor and handing over to richer contenders. hope revenue gets right message.
Rule of law is more sacrosanct than your revenue collection spree!