Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Giriraj Renewables PVT. LTD ( AAR Maharashtra)
Appeal Number : No. GST-ARA-01/2017/B-05
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/02/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Giriraj Renewables PVT. LTD (AAR Maharashtra)

Question  1

Whether supply of turnkey Engineering, Procurement and Construction (`EPC’) Contract for construction of a solar power plant wherein both goods and services are supplied can be construed to be a Composite Supply in terms of Section 2(30) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017?

The applicant poses for us to decide if the Engineering, Procurement and Construction (‘EPC’) Contract falls within the definition of ‘composite supply’ as found in the GST Act. Since we have elaborately discussed and observed above that the impugned transaction is a “works contract” u/ s 2(119) the GST Act, we need not even enter into the discussion as to whether the impugned transaction is a ‘composite supply” u/s 2(30) the GST Act. In view thereof, we are constrained, with reasons, to answer the first question in the negative. We move on to the second question.

Question 2

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031