CA Punkaj Jain
OUTLINE
- Background of Companies Bill, 2012
- Definition
- Audit & Auditors
- Penal provisions
- Loans and Investments
- Directors, KMP’s and Governance
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Regulatory bodies (NCLT, NFRA, SFIO)
- Mergers and Acquisitions
- Other key issues
- Way forward
WHY NEW COMPANIES ACT?
- Massive increase in number of Companies from about 30,000 in 1956 to nearly 8 lakhs; (How many active and compliant!!!)
- Modernization & regulatory harmony in the wake of corporate scandals; (Satyam Saga & Sahara OFCD’s issue)
- Recognition of good corporate practices & technological improvements;
- Simplification of law by placing related provisions under one clause/section
- Introduction of new provisions to meet the current economic environment
STRUCTURE OF COMPANIES BILL,2012…
NEW AMENDED TERMS
NEW TYPES OF COMPANIES
One Person Company – 2(62)
Introduction of One Person company akin to UK Companies Act
A private Company subscribed by one Individual;
Name shall affix OPC or one person Company
Dormant Company – 455
Introduction of Dormant Status: Formed for future project, holding as asset or intellectual property etc
Companies not carrying significant accounting transaction & inactive companies
ROC may suo-moto issue treat notice for dormant status
Small Company – 2(85)
Private Company having
INR 50 lacs of paid up capital (or higher limit to be prescribed not exceeding INR 5 Cr; and
Turnover not exceeding INR 2 Crores (or higher limit to be prescribed not exceeding INR 20 Cr)
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
Particulars |
One Person Co |
Small Co |
Dormant Co |
Cash flow requirement | NA | NA | NA |
Annual return | CS/ Director | NA | |
Board meetings | One meeting in each half of the calendar year and gap not less than 90 days | ||
Quorum | NA | 2 memberspersonally present | NA |
Others | Limited liability and flexibility in compliance | Relatively lessCompliance and easy to operate | Can be converted to an Active Co later |
Subsidiary Company – 2(87)
A company in which the holding company:
controls the composition of the board of directors; or
Exercises or controls more than one half of the total share capital either at its own or together with one or more of its subsidiary companies
Provided prescribed Companies shall not have layers of subsidiaries beyond such numbers as may be prescribed (discussed later)
Impact:
Under the extant provisions of the Act, it is more than one half of the total equity share capital, however the term used by the Bill is ‘share capital’ which may include all kinds of share capital including equity, preference or any other convertible securities
Private Company – 2(68)
Minimum paid-up share capital of 1 lacs; and
Restricts the right to transfer its shares; and
Limits the number of its members to 200
Impact
Ease of capital raising by offering securities to more than 50 members
However, Clause 42 (Private Placement) restricts the offer to not more than 50 people or such higher number as may be prescribed. These contradictory provisions need to be reconciled
OFFICER IN DEFAULT – 2(60)
The definition of the term has been expanded to include the following class of persons other than already provided under Section 5 of the Cos Act:
Any person who, under the immediate authority of the Board or any key managerial personnel, is charged with any responsibility including maintenance, filing or distribution of accounts or records, authorizes, actively participates in, knowingly permits, or knowingly fails to take active steps to prevent, any default
Every Director, who is aware of any contravention by virtue of receipt by him of any proceedings of the Board or participation in such proceedings without objecting to the same
In respect of the issue or transfer of any shares of a company, the share transfer agents, registrars and merchant bankers to the issue or transfer
PROMOTER – 2(69)
Person named in a prospectus or is identified as such in the annual return; or
Who has control over the affairs of the company, other than in professional capacity, as a shareholder or a director or otherwise; or
In accordance with whose advice or directions the Board is accustomed to act
Impact:
Widening of definition in line with SEBI and all penal provisions like fraud, non compliance etc now applicable to widened definition of ‘Promoters’
ASSOCIATE COMPANY – 2(6)
A company in which that other company has a significant influence, but which is not a subsidiary company of the company having such influence and includes a joint venture company
“Significant influence”:
Control of at least 20% of total share capital; or
business decisions under an agreement;
Impact:
- Disclosure of associate companies in financial report and consolidation for Associate Co’s
- Widens scope of related parties covering associate parties under its ambit
- Associate Company included to put restrictions on following:
- Qualification of Directors
- Qualification of Auditors
- Vacation of officer of Director (discussed in ensuing slides)
- Restriction on non-cash transactions involving directors
RELATED PARTY – 2(76)
- A director or his relative;
- A Key Managerial Personnel (‘KMP’) or his relative;
- A firm – in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner;
- A private company – in which a director or manager is a member or director;
- A public company: in which a director or manager is a director or holds along with his relatives, more than two per cent of its paid-up share capital;
Impact:
- All Related Parties Transactions (‘RPT’) to be at arm’s length price, similar to ALP under Income-tax Act
- All specified RPT to be approved by Board of Directors and special resolution in general meeting (except certain transactions with prescribed value and Cos with prescribed paid up capital)
CONTROL – 2(27)
- Includes the right to appoint majority of the directors; or
- control the management or policy decisions by a person or persons acting in concert, directly or indirectly, including by virtue of their shareholding; or Management rights or Shareholders agreements or Voting agreements or in any other manner;
Impact:
Definition in line with SEBI’s definition of control
FINANCIAL PERIOD – 2(41)
Means the period ending on the 31st day of March every year
The National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) shall have the power to allow a different financial year for companies which are either holding companies or subsidiaries of a company incorporated outside India so as to enable consolidation of accounts of such companies
Window of 2 year given to align the financials as per new Co’s Bill
FOREIGN COMPANY – 2(42)
‘Foreign Company’:
Any company or body corporate incorporated outside India which (a) has a place of business in India whether by itself or through an agent, physically or through electronic mode; and
conducts any business activity in India in any other manner
Impact:
Currently there is no specific provision for mandatory registration of foreign companies engaged in online business practices, e commerce activities etc
Enable effective regulation of such entities
LISTED COMPANY – 2(52)
‘Listed company’:
Means a company which has any of its securities listed on any recognized stock exchange
Impact:
With the new definition of listed company, Any Co having securities like debentures listed on any stock exchange would be termed as listed Company
ACCOUNTS OF COMPANIES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAJOR CHANGES
- Recognition of keeping Books of accounts in electronic form;
- Laying of Consolidated Accounts besides subsidiary shall also include associate company & joint venture;
- No provision for extension of financial year;
- Uniform Financial Yr, i.e. period ending 31st March
- Provision of re-opening/recasting of Books of A/c
- Provision of revision of financial statements;
- Authority to prescribe Accounting Standards now vested with Central Govt.
AUDIT & AUDITORS (CLAUSE 139 TO 148)
APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS -COMPARISON
Particulars |
Under Companies Act,1956 |
Under Companies Bill |
Mandatory rotation |
|
|
Whistleblower |
|
|
Restriction on services |
|
|
Other disqualification |
|
|
RESIGNATION & REMOVAL OF AUDITORS
Particulars |
Under Companies Act,1956 |
Under Companies Bill |
Reasons for resignation |
|
|
Special resolution on removal of auditor |
|
|
Change of auditor by Tribunal |
|
|
OTHER KEY PROVISIONS
- A limit of 20 audits per partner without any distinction between public and private companies, as against the current ICAI imposed limit of 30 audits
- Ratification of appointment of auditors, by the members at every annual general meeting of the company, has been made mandatory
- Shareholders at liberty to decide by passing resolution that audit partner and the audit team, be rotated every year
- Company bound to re-open and recast its financial statements if application having been made by following and an order has been made by the NCLT or a other Court
- Central Government, SEBI, Income tax authority
- Any Statutory body or authority or any person concerned
- Consolidated financial statements of companies are required to also include financial statements of associate companies and joint ventures
- Class action suits, can be filed against auditors to claim damages or compensation for improper or misleading statement of particulars in the audit report or for fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful actions
LLP /PARTNERS OF LLP AS AUDITORS
- The word “firm” shall include a incorporated LLP;
- LLP can be appointed as an Auditor but only Chartered Accountant can act as an Auditor under Clause 141(2);
- Impact:
- Formation of Multi disciplinary/ Hybrid LLP’s permitted
- Corresponding amendments to be brought in Acts governing professionals like CA, CS, CWA’s etc.
NEGATIVE LIST OF SERVICES- AUDITORS
Clause 144
- Accounting and book keeping services
- Internal audit
- Design and implementation of any financial information system
- Actuarial services
- Investment advisory services
- Investment banking services
- Rendering of outsourced financial services
- Management services
- Directly/ Indirectly not allowed
AUGMENTED RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUDITORS
- Expected to act as Whistle Blower;
- Mandatory Attendee of the AGM;
- Conduct of Internal Audit by CA/CWA/authorized professional;
- Written consent & Certificate required in case of Appointment;
- Extraneous duty to report to Central Govt. in case of fraud;
- Imposition of Criminal Liability on Auditors
PENAL PROVISIONS
UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956
UNDER COMPANIES BILL 2012
NEW PENAL PROVISION -CLAUSE 147
AUDITING OF AUDITORS
- Replacement of NACAS by NFRA;
- Autonomy given to ICAI under the C.A. Act curtailed;
- Harsh Provisions of Clause 140 & 147 can be restricted to large & listed Co’s;
- Prohibition of rendering consultancy services to hamper growth of CA Profession;
- Difficulty in Survival of small and medium-size audit firms.
LOANS AND INVESTMENTS BY COMPANY – 186
Particulars |
Sections of extant Co’s Act |
Corresponding Clause of Bill |
Applicability |
Not applicable to Private Company |
Applicable to all Companies |
Coverage |
• Loans given by one company to another company • Guarantees and securities in favour of a person who has given any loan to the company • Acquiring by subscription or otherwise, securities of a company by other company |
• Loan to any person or other body corporate • Guarantee or provide security in connection with a loan to any other body corporate or person • Acquiring by subscription or otherwise, securities of a company by other company |
Exemptions |
• Exemption available for loans, investments and guarantees given by Holding Co to its WOS |
• No such exemption |
Exemptions |
Exemption available to infrastructure companies for loans, provision of security and guarantee, investments |
The exemption available to infrastructure companies continues for loans, provision of security and guarantee but not for investments |
Rate of loan |
• At the prevailing bank rate |
• At a rate not lower than the prevailing yield of the 1, 3, 5 or 10 years G-Sec closest to the tenor of the loan |
Upper limit/ Capping |
Higher of • 60% (Paid-up share capital+ free reserves) or • 100% (free reserves and) |
Higher of • 60% (Paid-up share capital+ free reserves + Securities premium) or • 100% (free reserves and securities premium) |
Approval for exceeding the limit |
No change. Prior approval by Special resolution passed in general meeting |
No change. Prior approval by Special resolution passed in general meeting |
Impact:
- Private limited included under new clause
- Definition widened as loans given to ‘any person’ included
- Clarity bought on inclusion of securities premium for upper cap
- Rate of loan in line with yield of G-Sec
DIRECTORS, KMP’s & GOVERNANCE
NEW CONCEPTS
COMPOSITION OF BOARD – COMPARATIVE
COMPOSITION OF BOARD – COMPARATIVE
Particulars | Under Companies Act,1956 | Under Companies Bill |
Max. Directors
Public: Private: |
Section 252
|
Clause 149
|
Number of Directorship | Section 275
|
Clause 165
|
Resident Director |
|
Clause 149 (2)
|
Women Director |
|
Clause 149 (1)
|
GOVERNANCE OF BOARD – COMPARATIVE
Particulars |
Under Companies Act,1956 |
Under Companies Bill |
1st Board meeting | Section 285, 286
|
Clause 173
|
Minimum number of meetings |
|
|
Board meeting notice timeline |
|
KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL (KMP)
KMP’s covered under ‘Officer in Default’ & ‘Related Parties’
A KMP cannot be a KMP of any other company other than the subsidiary
INTENT TO INTRODUCE KMP’S
Recognition of highest level of Management Personnel with Liabilities commensurate with their position
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
- No provision of Independent Director under Act but term now defined in the Bill
- Prescribed Co’s including Listed Co’s, to have minimum 1/3rd Directors as Independent Directors
- Limited Tenure: Maximum of 2 consecutive tenures of 5 consecutive years
- Not entitled to any remuneration in form of stock option
- Insulated from liability unless the fraudulent act is done with their consent, knowledge & connivance
MANAGERIAL REMUNERATION
- Maximum limit of 11% profits – retained
- Insurance Premium not be treated as part of remuneration
- Public Co’s required to seek prior approval of CG; if limits exceeded
- Additional exemptions in case of Co’s having no/inadequate profits
- Enhanced Individual limits vis-à-vis existing limits
CSR PROVISIONS – CLAUSE 135
– Applicability:
Company which satisfies any one conditions
Net worth of INR 500 Cr or more; or
Turnover of INR 1000 Cr or more; or
Net profit of INR 5 Cr or more during any financial year
– Activities which may be included enlisted in SCHEDULE VII
– CSR Committee:
Mandatory to constitute CSR Committee of the board
Constitution: At least 3 Directors; One director shall be an independent director
– Role of CSR Committee:
Formulate and monitor the CSR policy; and
Recommend the expenditure to be incurred on such activities
– Board Role and responsibility:
Disclosure of CSR committee and contents of policy in report
Board to ensure that that the CSR policy is complied; and
The company spends at least 2% of the average net profits made by the company in the preceding three financial years in accordance with the policy
In case of failure, Board to give reasons in the board’s report
– Impact:
Mandatory to formulate a CSR committee and policy
Difficult for start up Companies to comply with CSR provisions
Deductibility of expenditure incurred under Income-tax
–Suggestions:
Deemed deduction for any CSR expenditure as revenue expenditure under Income-tax
A weighted deduction for tax purposes of, say, 150% of the CSR expenditure could be introduced
CSR done under Trust etc should also be considered for 2%
REGULATORY BODIES
NFRA – CLAUSE 132
–Constitution
CG to constitute NFRA – Quasi judicial authority by notification
Appeal for a order of NFRA shall lie before Appellate Authority
NFRA given powers of a civil court for investigation.
–Composition
1 chai person & members (Maximum 15)
– Role
Advisory role, monitoring compliances & Investigation of professional misconduct by CA’s;
Oversee the quality of service of the Auditors;
PENALIZATION UNDER NFRA
- Penalty of not Less than 1 Lakh in case of Individual Auditor ;
- Penalty of not Less than 10 Lakh in case of Audit Firm; &
- Debar from Professional Practice for 6 months to 10 years
ICAI VS. NFRA
- Marginalization of ICAI;
- Intrusion into Exclusive domain of ICAI like Investigation, Penalization, recommendation of Accounting & Auditing Policies;
- Restriction ICAI’s role to acting as a certifying body;
- Seizure of power to institute proceedings if already initiated by NFRA
Impact/ Issues:
- Matters of misconduct handled by ICAI in past
- Validity of verdict by peers
NCLT – CLAUSE 408-410
National company law tribunal (‘NCLT’)
– Constitution
CG by notification to constitute NCLT & its appellate body, NCLAT (Proposed to replace CLB, BIFR & AIFR)
– Role
Speedy disposal of cases; likely within 3 months
All proceedings relating to Arbitration, Compromise & Arrangement shall be transferred to NCLT
Special Courts can be set up Government for speedy trials
– Impact/ Issues:
Consolidation of all legal bodies of Corporate law
Practical issues regarding functioning, resource and training to Authorities
SFIO – CLAUSE 211
Serious Fraud Investigation Office (‘SFIO’)
– Object of SFIO under New Co’s Bill
- Specific enunciation of good governance practices
- Easier prosecution of Delinquent Directors
- Active involvement of Directors
- Enhancement of objectivity/independence by non-executive & Independent Directors
- Liabilities specified with defined limits
– Constitution
Status of SFIO established under Bill
– Role
- Investigation of Report of SFIO equivalent to Police Report for framing charges
- Power to arrest in case of certain cognizable offences
- Stringent penalty provided for fraud related offences
Impact/ Issues
- Strengthening of investigation proceedings
- Effective process by inclusion of experts of various field
MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
Particulars |
Extant Co’s Act |
Co’s Bill, 2012 |
Merger of Indian Co into Foreign Co |
• Not permitted |
• Permitted • Prior approval of the RBI required before any foreign company merges with an Indian company or vice versa |
Creation of Treasury stock |
• No such restriction |
• The Bill prohibits creation of treasury stocks |
Merger or amalgamation between small companies or between holding companies and a WOS or prescribed companies |
• No such provision |
• Proposed new process of merger/ amalgamation of small companies or group companies involves the approval of • shareholders holding at least 90% of the shares of the company • RoC • Official liquidator • Central Government |
Auditors certificate |
• No such provision for Private Cos |
• Auditor to certify accounting treatment in the scheme is in conformity with the AS prescribed under Clause 133 of the Bill |
Dispensation of the meeting of creditors |
• Possible to seek approval of dispensation based upon consent letters received |
• Creditor or class of creditors, having at least 90% value agree and confirm, by way of an affidavit to the scheme |
OTHER KEY ISSUES
NEW CONCEPTS INTRODUCED
- Recognition of electronic form of Books of Account
- Provision of re-opening/recasting of books of accounts
- Provision of revision of financial statements
- Authority to prescribe Accounting Standards now vested with CG
REGISTERED VALUER
– Role
Appointment made mandatory
Valuation of shares, net worth, assets, liabilities, as required under law
Specific duties & role of Register Valuer has been prescribed
– Others
Qualification & experience as prescribed by way of Rules
Appointment to be effective by audit committee or Board of Directors
– Mandatory valuation
- Allotment of Shares for consideration other than cash
- Acquisition of minority shareholding by holders of at least 90% of issued equity share capital of a company
- Exit opportunity to the dissenting shareholders of transferor company/listed company being merged with an unlisted company
- Submission of valuation report by liquidator in the event where tribunal has made a winding up order
- Declaration of solvency by the board of directors in the event of voluntary winding up
OTHER IMPORTANT PROVISIONS
WAY FORWARD
- Bill to be passed in Rajya Sabha and assent of the President
- Rules to be prescribed and notified for implementation of Cos Bill
- Preparing the Regulatory bodies with adequate resources and training
it is very good for the studentss od ca cs cwa as well as for the new prfessionals . Very good work.
It is also useful for the students of CA CS CMA AS well as the new practationers very good work
well informative writeup. benefited by readers .
CA. Subhash Chandra Podder , FCA
Kolkta
06/02/2013
keep me informed about the latest amendments
thanking you
With regards
Yawer Rashid
It is good for the corporate and also for the new professinals they have chance to take part in audit and also responsible for their Act as a professional.
It is a comprehensive insight and in depth analysis of the provisions of the companies bill 2012.The comparison with the Companies Act 1956 makes it more delightful & interesting to read.Great Efforts.