Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income-tax Officer Vs Shri Prem Rattan Gupta (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.5803/Mum/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/03/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Assessee has given the right of the additional FSI/TDR which the assessee was otherwise entitled to get from the local body / Government for the acquisition of the land if the assessee has not taken any consideration. So far as issue of the TDR is concerned, the value of the TDR cannot be the subject matter of sec. 50C and admittedly, the assessee gets additional FSI / TDR only after the acquisition of the land. As per the Land Acquisition Act once the notification is issued then assessee loses the title of the land or property. Ultimately, what has to be considered is the net area available with assessee for transferring to the Developer.

The Ld. D.R. relied on the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Chedda Housing Development vs. Babijan Shekh Farid – 2007 (3) ML 402 (Bom) in which their Lordships have interpreted the definition of ‘immovable property’ under General Clauses Act, 1897. In our humble opinion, the term ‘immovable property’ has a very wide meaning then the words ‘land and building’. Sec.50C refers to land and building and not to immovable property as whole. Hence, the reliance placed by the Ld. D.R. on the decision of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in case of Chedda Housing Corporation (supra) is not helpful to the revenue.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

ITA No.5803/Mum/2009 – (Assessment year: 2006-07)

Income-tax Officer

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. n.krishnamoorthy says:

    On the subjecty of listing out the de4ductions eligible for relief u/s.80C of the Ineometax Act, so long as the Govt does not enlarge the list or increase them deduction limit, there is no point in repeating the items. In these days of acute inflation, Rs one lakh being the maximum allowable deduction is too small to make any big difference to the tax liability. Secondly, the withdrawal of standard deduction for the salaried class is a hard blow. The Govt will stand to benefit a lot if it increases the limit u/s 80C. Moneys available to the Govt for investment in development will increase manifold. If the standard deduction for salaried class and the deduction u/s.80C are increased, the salaaried class will be left with more money which it will invest in the enhanced deductions u/s.80C. It is hoped that in the forthcoming budget the Fiance Ministyer will give serious thought to these suggestions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031