Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Munjal Sales vs. CIT (Supreme Court)

(i) A firm seeking to claim deduction of interest paid on capital from its partners has to first satisfy the requirements of s. 36(1)(iii) and thereafter the limits imposed by s. 40(b)(iv). The fact that the said capital is not “loans” or “advances” is irrelevant.

(ii) Where loans given in an earlier year were accepted as having been given for business purposes, the interest thereon could not be disallowed in a subsequent year.

(iii) Where the assessee had sufficient profits and own funds, the submission that loans to sister concerns were out of those funds had to be accepted.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031