Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gujarat State Financial Services Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 2078/Ahd/2006 & 2526/Ahd/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2001- 02
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Penalty proceedings- Mere submitting a claim which is incorrect in law would not amount to giving inaccurate particulars of income of assessee, but if claim besides being incorrect in law is malafide, Explanation 1 to section 271(1)(c) comes into play and work to disadvantage of assessee.

If the assessee makes a claim which is not only incorrect in law but is also wholly without any basis and the explanation furnished by him for making such a claim is not found to be bonafide, it would be difficult to say that he would still not be liable to penalty under section 271(1)(c).

ITAT, AHMEDABAD BENCH `B’,

Gujarat State Financial Services Ltd. Vs. ACIT

ITA Nos. 2078/Ahd/2006 & 2526/Ahd/2006,

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Nem Singh says:

    It is true but the officials misuse their powers and post and hresh the assessee without any finding in the order. They followed that it is mandatory to do so in the case of addition.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031