Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Orion Appliances Ltd Vs. CST (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year :
CESTAT decision in the case of Orion Appliances Ltd Vs. CST, Ahmedabad (2010-TIOL-752-CESTAT? AHM) Brief Facts:- Orion Appliances Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the „appellant?) was engaged in providing maintenance and repair and commissioning and installation services. The appellant was also engaged in trading activities. The appellant availed CENVAT credit of service tax paid on various input services including advertising, security, courier, telephone and banking services which were used in provision of taxable output services as well as for trading activities. The appellant utilised t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. V BALU says:

    The dept. should not have gone for 6(2) and 3(4). The appellant is not eligible to avail the credit intoto in as much as the same has not been used for rendering an output service. In my opinion Tribunals view is corrent and in order

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930