Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Tehsildar’s Possession Letter Does Not Restart SARFAESI Limitation: DRT Ludhiana

Case Law Details

Case Name
Deepak Kumar Vs Authorised Officer (DRT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Deepak Kumar Vs Authorised Officer (DRT Chandigarh) The Securitization Application (SA) was filed under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act seeking to set aside the demand notice issued under Section 13(2), the possession notice issued under Section 13(4), and the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 14. The applicants contended that their housing loan account became irregular during the COVID-19 period, that the Section 13(2) notice was not served upon one of the borrowers, the Section 13(4) possession notice was not served upon both borrowers, defects ex...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,893

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *