Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bihari Parmanand Kandhari Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bihari Parmanand Kandhari Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Can’t Survive Merely on ‘Accommodation Entry’ Allegation When Loan Is Repaid Through Bank” – Mumbai ITAT In a major relief to the assessee, the Mumbai ITAT deleted a ₹30 lakh addition u/s 68, holding that merely because the lender was allegedly involved in providing accommodation entries, a genuine loan transaction supported by documentary evidence and routed entirely through banking channels cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit. The assessee, engaged in real estate development, had originally completed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031