Case Law Details
Case Name : Smt. Subbalakshmi Kurada Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Subbalakshmi Kurada Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
In , the ITAT Bangalore deleted penalty under Section 271(1)(c), holding that mere disallowance or change in head of income does not amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.
The assessee had:
Shown rental income partly as rent and partly as hire charges (under business income)
Claimed Section 54 deduction on reinvestment made jointly with her son
The AO:
Reclassified hire charges as house property income
Restricted Section 54 deduction
Levied penalty alleging inaccurate particulars
However, the Tribunal observed:
All fac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


