Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bannari Amman Fresh Fruit Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bannari Amman Fresh Fruit Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The ITAT Chennai quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148, holding that the notice issued beyond 3 years is invalid where the alleged escaped income is less than ₹50 lakhs. In this case, the assessee, engaged in retail trading of fruits and vegetables, faced reassessment based on cash deposits during the demonetisation period. The Assessing Officer issued notice under Section 148 on 30.07.2022 for AY 2017–18 and made additions under Section 68. However, the assessee challenged the reopening on legal grounds. The Tribun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930