Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramachandran Meenakshi Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramachandran Meenakshi Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment The assessee challenged the validity of reopening notice u/s 148 for AY 2018-19 on the ground that the mandatory sanction from the specified authority u/s 151 was not obtained. The AO had issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 23.03.2022 and notice u/s 148 on 05.04.2022, after obtaining approval only from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT). The assessee contended that since more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year (31.03.202...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031