Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jawaharlal Devidas Chhabria Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jawaharlal Devidas Chhabria Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Tolerance Band Benefit Allowed Even After DVO Valuation – Sec 56(2)(x) Addition Deleted – ITAT Mumbai The assessee purchased property at a price lower than stamp duty value, leading to addition u/s 56(2)(x). After DVO reference, valuation difference reduced to ₹5.76 lakh and CIT(A) restricted addition to ₹1.92 lakh (assessee’s 1/3rd share). Before ITAT, the assessee argued that once DVO value falls within permissible tolerance range under proviso to sec 50C(1), no addition should survive. Tribunal held that DVO valuation u/s 50C(2) and...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930