Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jawaharlal Devidas Chhabria Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jawaharlal Devidas Chhabria Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Tolerance Band Benefit Allowed Even After DVO Valuation – Sec 56(2)(x) Addition Deleted – ITAT Mumbai The assessee purchased property at a price lower than stamp duty value, leading to addition u/s 56(2)(x). After DVO reference, valuation difference reduced to ₹5.76 lakh and CIT(A) restricted addition to ₹1.92 lakh (assessee’s 1/3rd share). Before ITAT, the assessee argued that once DVO value falls within permissible tolerance range under proviso to sec 50C(1), no addition should survive. Tribunal held that DVO valuation u/s 50C(2) and...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930