Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vishal Navinchandra Shah Vs CIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vishal Navinchandra Shah Vs CIT (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Rajkot Remands Sec 50C Addition – Mandatory DVO Reference Required When Assessee Disputes Stamp Value In Vishal Navinchandra Shah vs CIT(A) (AY 2013-14), the ITAT Rajkot allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and restored the matter to the AO after holding that section 50C was not applied in its correct legal spirit. The assessee had sold two properties for ₹31.89 lakh, whereas the stamp valuation authority adopted value of ₹55.15 lakh, leading to addition of ₹23.26 lakh to LTCG u/s 50C. The Tribunal noted that the as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930