Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kesireddy Ravinder Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kesireddy Ravinder Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad Deletes Sec 271D Penalty – Cash Received as Sale Consideration of Property Not Covered by Sec 269SS In Kesireddy Ravinder Reddy & Yata Ramchander vs ITO (AY 2017-18), the ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessees’ appeals and deleted penalty levied u/s 271D for alleged violation of sec 269SS. The assessees had received cash of ₹15.65 lakh (₹7.82 lakh each) as part of registered sale consideration for transfer of immovable property, which the JCIT treated as “specified sum” and imposed penalty equal to the cash amount. T...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930