Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs United Provinces Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs United Provinces Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) In this case, CPC passed intimation u/s 143(1) while processing return and disallowed carry forward of business loss ₹22.62 Cr and unabsorbed depreciation ₹31.68 Cr without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(1)(a). CIT(A) allowed assessee’s appeal holding adjustment void ab initio, which was affirmed by ITAT. The assessee had filed return for AY 2024-25 claiming refund after set-off of brought forward losses, and such losses were consistently accepted in earlier years’ intimations. However, CPC made adjustment without giving ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930