Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ketan Natvarlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ketan Natvarlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) The ITAT, Surat Bench, held that re-opening based on a notice u/s 148 dated 31-03-2021 but actually issued/served on 01-04-2021 is invalid in law, as it falls under the new reassessment regime effective from 01-04-2021. In this case (AY 2013-14), the AO claimed to have issued notice u/s 148 on 31-03-2021 under the old law. However, system-generated records clearly showed that the notice was issued and served through e-proceedings on 01-04-2021. Once the notice crosses into 01-04-2021, the AO was mandatorily required to follow the procedure u/s 148A—tr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for VSI Contribution & Section 244A Interest Skill Development Institution Qualifies as ‘Education’; Section 12AA/12AB Registration Restored: Pune ITAT Only Profit Element Taxable for Transport Booking Agent; Income Restricted to 3%: Pune ITAT Investor Cannot Be Denied Section 10(35) Exemption for Mutual Fund Violations: Pune ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Vague Reasons & Lack of Supporting Material: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031