Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjana Sanjay Arora Vs DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjana Sanjay Arora Vs DDIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order confirming a penalty of ₹10 lakh levied under section 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, in the case of Sanjana Sanjay Arora for AY 2017-18. The penalty was imposed for alleged non-disclosure of a foreign bank account maintained with Barclays Bank UK PLC in Schedule FA of the return of income. The assessee contended that she had only one primary GBP account and that the EURO and USD accounts were merely add-o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930