Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manharlal Keshavlal Bhimjiyani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manharlal Keshavlal Bhimjiyani Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Cash Deposit of ₹31 Lakh Largely Explained; ITAT Rajkot Restricts Addition to 10% on Estimation, Deletes Section 115BBE Levy The Rajkot SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot Bench partly allowed the appeal of Shri Manharlal Keshavlal Bhimjiyani for AY 2017-18, granting substantial relief from an addition of ₹31,00,000 made under section 69A read with section 115BBE on account of cash deposits. The assessee had deposited ₹31 lakh during FY 2016-17. He explained that the cash originated mainly from earlier withdrawals of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930