Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The reassessment for AY 2018-19 treated purchases of ₹11.47 lakh from a suspected accommodation entry provider as bogus and disallowed them under section 37(1), since the transactions were found non-genuine though recorded in the books and paid through banking channels. Invoking section 263, the PCIT held the assessment to be erroneous and directed the AO to instead tax the amount as unexplained expenditure under section 69C and apply the higher tax rate under section 115BBE. The Tribunal held this revision to be without jurisdiction. It noted that section 69C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930