Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vaibhav Mittal Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Indore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vaibhav Mittal Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Indore) ITAT Indore Dismisses Appeal Against Section 154 Order; Addition u/s 69A Cannot Be Challenged Through Rectification The Indore Bench of the ITAT dismissed the assessee’s appeal and upheld the order passed by the CIT(A)-NFAC under section 154 read with section 250, holding that rectification proceedings cannot be used to challenge or review an addition made on merits. The case pertained to AY 2012-13, where the Assessing Officer, in a best judgment assessment under section 144, had made an addition of ₹1.26 lakh under section 69A on account of unexp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930