Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manishabne Kaizad Motawala Vs TTO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manishabne Kaizad Motawala Vs TTO (ITAT Surat) Minor Valuation Difference Cannot Justify Capital Gains Addition: ITAT Surat Accepts Registered Valuer’s Cost of Acquisition The Surat Bench (SMC) of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2022-23, deleting the addition made on account of difference in cost of acquisition of ancestral property as on 01.04.2001. The assessee had adopted a value of ₹1,100 per sq. meter based on a Registered Valuer’s report, whereas the Assessing Officer, relying on the DVO’s report, adopted a slightly lower value of ₹1,000 per sq. meter and made a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930