Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tomar & Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Tomar & Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated Disallowances, 40(a)(ia) and 41(1) Additions – ITAT Agra Deletes Entire Penalty

The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the entire penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2014-15. The penalty related to three additions: (i) ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure based on estimation, (ii) disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), and (iii) addition of sundry creditors/debtors treated under section 41(1). The Tribunal held that no penalty c

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT Cannot Convert Bogus Purchase Disallowance into Section 69C Income via Revision u/s 263 Intra-Group Loan Restructuring & Partner Account Reclassification Not Bogus Credits Reassessment for Bogus Purchases Quashed: Approval by Pr.CIT Invalid After 3 Years ITAT Selection Set Aside for Bias: SC Orders Fresh Committee Without Tainted Member Property Deal Addition Fails for Breach of Section 153C Time Limits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728