Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tomar & Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tomar & Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated Disallowances, 40(a)(ia) and 41(1) Additions – ITAT Agra Deletes Entire Penalty The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the entire penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2014-15. The penalty related to three additions: (i) ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure based on estimation, (ii) disallowance under section 40(a)(ia), and (iii) addition of sundry creditors/debtors treated under section 41(1). The Tribunal held that no penalty can be levied where income or expendi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930