This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cash Deposit Addition Quashed for Trader Covered by Section 44AD
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Presumptive Taxation Overrides Section 68 – ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹15.36 Lakh Cash Credit Addition and Directs Re-Computation Under Section 44AD
The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹15.35 lakhs made u/s 68, holding that once income is assessed under the presumptive scheme u/s 44AD, no part of turnover or deposits can be separately treated as unexplained cash credits.
The assessee, a small cloth trader, had originally declared turnover of ₹7.65 lakhs and later...





