Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Cash Deposit Addition Quashed for Trader Covered by Section 44AD

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Presumptive Taxation Overrides Section 68 – ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹15.36 Lakh Cash Credit Addition and Directs Re-Computation Under Section 44AD The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹15.35 lakhs made u/s 68, holding that once income is assessed under the presumptive scheme u/s 44AD, no part of turnover or deposits can be separately treated as unexplained cash credits. The assessee, a small cloth trader, had originally declared turnover of ₹7.65 lakhs and later...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,900

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *