Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ghamanda Ram Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Presumptive Taxation Overrides Section 68 – ITAT Chandigarh Deletes ₹15.36 Lakh Cash Credit Addition and Directs Re-Computation Under Section 44AD The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹15.35 lakhs made u/s 68, holding that once income is assessed under the presumptive scheme u/s 44AD, no part of turnover or deposits can be separately treated as unexplained cash credits. The assessee, a small cloth trader, had originally declared turnover of ₹7.65 lakhs and later, in response to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930