Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Kumar Malik Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satish Kumar Malik Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Largely Accepted: ITAT Restricts Addition to ₹2 Lakh and Bars Section 115BBE The Delhi ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal in a demonetisation cash deposit case by substantially deleting the addition of ₹44.44 lakh made under Section 68 and holding that the harsh provisions of Section 115BBE were not applicable for AY 2017-18. The assessee, a trader, had explained that the deposits represented cash sales made prior to 08.11.2016 and available cash in hand duly recorded in audited books of account, which were neithe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930