Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Kumar Malik Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satish Kumar Malik Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Largely Accepted: ITAT Restricts Addition to ₹2 Lakh and Bars Section 115BBE The Delhi ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal in a demonetisation cash deposit case by substantially deleting the addition of ₹44.44 lakh made under Section 68 and holding that the harsh provisions of Section 115BBE were not applicable for AY 2017-18. The assessee, a trader, had explained that the deposits represented cash sales made prior to 08.11.2016 and available cash in hand duly recorded in audited books of account, which were neithe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930