Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D: Third-Party Statements Alone Not Enough The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2010-11 and deleted the penalty of ₹37,00,000 levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the penalty was imposed solely on the basis of third-party statements without any corroborative evidence. The assessee, Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia, was subjected to penalty proceedings after the Assessing Officer alleged acceptance of cash loans of ₹37 lakh, based on sta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930