This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh 271D Penalty: Third-Party Statements Insufficient
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D: Third-Party Statements Alone Not Enough
The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2010-11 and deleted the penalty of ₹37,00,000 levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the penalty was imposed solely on the basis of third-party statements without any corroborative evidence.
The assessee, Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia, was subjected to penalty proceedings after the Assessing Officer alleged acceptance of cash loans of ₹37 lakh, based on sta...





