Case Law Details
Case Name : Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹37 Lakh Penalty u/s 271D: Third-Party Statements Alone Not Enough
The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2010-11 and deleted the penalty of ₹37,00,000 levied under section 271D for alleged violation of section 269SS, holding that the penalty was imposed solely on the basis of third-party statements without any corroborative evidence.
The assessee, Kamal Dwarkadas Gadodia, was subjected to penalty proceedings after the Assessing Officer alleged acceptance of cash loans of ₹37 lakh, based on sta...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


