Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ummaid mal Singhvi Vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ummaid mal Singhvi Vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur) ITAT Jodhpur: Addition u/s 69 Restored to AO to Verify ‘Rotation of Funds’ Explanation The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2008-09 for statistical purposes, restoring a limited issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification. The Tribunal was seized of a recalled appeal to adjudicate Ground No. 5, relating to an addition of ₹5,66,600 sustained by the CIT(A) under section 69 as unexplained investment. The assessee contended that the source of the amount stood explained through a statement of rotation of f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930