Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Jai Narain Aeren Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Jai Narain Aeren Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Limitation Starts with AO’s Action, Not Addl. CIT’s Notice: ITAT Quashes 271D/271E Penalties as Time-Barred The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed a batch of eight appeals filed by the assessee and deleted penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19, holding that the penalty orders were barred by limitation under section 275(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. In this case, the assessment orders were completed on 29.12.2022, wherein the Assessing Officer recorded satisfaction and initiated penalty pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930