Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Jai Narain Aeren Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Sanjeev Jai Narain Aeren Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Limitation Starts with AO’s Action, Not Addl. CIT’s Notice: ITAT Quashes 271D/271E Penalties as Time-Barred The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed a batch of eight appeals filed by the assessee and deleted penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19, holding that the penalty orders were barred by limitation under section 275(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. In this case, the assessment orders were completed on 29.12.2022, wherein the Assessing Officer recorded satisfaction and initiated penalty pr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031