Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deputy Gothwal Constructions Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Deputy Gothwal Constructions Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) EDC Payments to DTCP/HUDA: Delhi ITAT Remands TDS Default Issue u/s 201, Relief Possible If Payee Paid Tax Delhi ITAT set aside the ex-parte order of CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification in relation to alleged TDS default on payment of External Development Charges (EDC) made to DTCP/HUDA. The Assessee was treated as an assessee-in-default u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194C on EDC of ₹4.60 crore, resulting in a demand of ₹17.20 lakh. The Assessee contended that EDC payments w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai Ad Hoc Commission Cap Without Comparables Invalid; Section 40A(2)(b) Inapplicable: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031