Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deputy Gothwal Constructions Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Deputy Gothwal Constructions Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) EDC Payments to DTCP/HUDA: Delhi ITAT Remands TDS Default Issue u/s 201, Relief Possible If Payee Paid Tax Delhi ITAT set aside the ex-parte order of CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh verification in relation to alleged TDS default on payment of External Development Charges (EDC) made to DTCP/HUDA. The Assessee was treated as an assessee-in-default u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194C on EDC of ₹4.60 crore, resulting in a demand of ₹17.20 lakh. The Assessee contended that EDC payments w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930