Depreciation Can’t Be Denied on Suspicion After MAP Resolution
CA Vijayakumar Shetty
18 Dec 2025
150 Views
1 comment
Print
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 63
Income Tax |
Warning: Undefined variable $show_all_types in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 71
Judiciary
Warning: Undefined variable $all_cats in /home/taxguru/public_html/wp-content/themes/tgv5/single.php on line 80
Case Law Details
Case Name : Scania Commercial Vehicles India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Scania Commercial Vehicles India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Bangalore ITAT granted substantial relief to the Assessee on multiple corporate tax issues after noting that transfer-pricing adjustments had already been resolved under MAP.
For AY 2017-18, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of depreciation on fixed assets holding that ownership, user & actual cost were undisputed and mere suspicion about source of funds could not justify denial of depreciation. The addition on account of warranty p
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.



Comments are closed.