Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Rule 46A can’t be bypassed even if evidences are official records or available in public domain : ITAT restores issue to CIT(A) on improper admission of additional evidence Delhi ITAT allowed Revenue’s appeal for statistical purposes &  set aside the order of CIT(A) on the limited issue of admission of additional evidence. Tribunal noted that CIT(A) admitted substantial additional evidence, including VAT returns to justify cash sales, without recording satisfaction under Rule 46A &  without calling for any remand report or comments from A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930