Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Borze India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Rule 46A can’t be bypassed even if evidences are official records or available in public domain : ITAT restores issue to CIT(A) on improper admission of additional evidence Delhi ITAT allowed Revenue’s appeal for statistical purposes &  set aside the order of CIT(A) on the limited issue of admission of additional evidence. Tribunal noted that CIT(A) admitted substantial additional evidence, including VAT returns to justify cash sales, without recording satisfaction under Rule 46A &  without calling for any remand report or comments from A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54 Deduction Allowed Despite Incomplete Documents – Substance Over Form Prevails Reassessment Quashed: Failure to Dispose Objections Makes 148 Proceedings Invalid- Bang Trib Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930