Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alpesh Narendra Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alpesh Narendra Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) VSV Opt-Out Revives Appeal: Deemed Withdrawal Under VSV Not Fatal – Additional Evidence Ignored: Tribunal Remands Case for De Novo Disposal Assessee filed returns declaring income of Rs.27,46,700. AO noticed unsecured loans of Rs.1,35,77,021 & cash credits of Rs.2,07,57,087, treated them as non-genuine & made additions u/s 143(3). CIT(A) sustained the additions. Before the appellate order, Assessee opted for settlement u/s 4(2) of Vivad-se-Vishwas (DTVSVA); Form-3 was issued, resulting in deemed withdrawal of appeal u/s 5(1). However, As...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031