This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Non-Speaking Order Set Aside – ITAT Sends ₹7.26 Cr Capital-Gain Dispute Back to CIT(A)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-2019
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kaushal Kumar Parmar Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Assessee did not file ROI originally. Based on information regarding sale of immovable property and cash deposits, AO issued notice u/s 148. Assessee then filed return declaring income of ₹10,43,400. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, making a massive addition u/s 45 by taking the entire gross sale consideration of ₹7,26,82,500 as taxable capital gains, resulting in assessed income of ₹7,37,25,900.
Before CIT(A)/NFAC, assessee did not attend hearings fixed on 05/03/2025, 19/03/2025, 05/05/2025 & 27/05/2025. CIT(A), therefore, passed...




