Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Proton Positive Health Care India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Proton Positive Health Care India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Mere Failure to Substantiate Is Not “Inaccurate Particulars” – 56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Holding–Subsidiary Share Issue Hyderabad Tribunal dealt with penalty u/s 271(1)(c) imposed on two issues—unproved sundry creditors of Rs.6,53,613 & share premium addition of Rs.77,46,883 u/s 56(2)(viib). In assessment, AO added creditors due to lack of PAN/address details & taxed share premium due to absence of valuation certificate. Assessee did not appeal quantum. AO levied penalty treating both issues as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld No Exempt Income = No U/s 14A Disallowance – ITAT Bangalore Reaffirms Settled Law View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930