Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manju Devi Begani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Manju Devi Begani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

Surat ITAT considered several additions including ₹2,23,207 disallowed u/s 14A, ₹76,24,846 treated as bogus agricultural income u/s 68, & ₹11,43,727 estimated as agricultural expenses. Assessee filed manual appeal in time in 2016, later e-filed due to amended Rules, resulting in a technical delay of 35 days.

CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without appreciating the explanation & passed a non-speaking order without examining merits. Tribunal held that CIT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment on Amalgamated Company Held Void for Lack of Jurisdiction Penalty for Non-Compliance Deleted as Venial Breach Where Assessments Accepted Returned Income Carbon Credit Sale Treated as Capital Receipt, Not Taxable Income Search Assessments Quashed for Lack of Prior U/s 153D Approval Documented and Repaid Unsecured Loans Cannot Be Treated as Accommodation Entries u/s 68 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031