Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manju Devi Begani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manju Devi Begani Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Surat ITAT considered several additions including ₹2,23,207 disallowed u/s 14A, ₹76,24,846 treated as bogus agricultural income u/s 68, & ₹11,43,727 estimated as agricultural expenses. Assessee filed manual appeal in time in 2016, later e-filed due to amended Rules, resulting in a technical delay of 35 days. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without appreciating the explanation & passed a non-speaking order without examining merits. Tribunal held that CIT(A) erred in ignoring valid reasons for delay & condoned the same. Tribunal restored the en...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930