This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Invalid Due to Ambiguous Satisfaction Recorded by AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shiva Preservation Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Shiva Preservation Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Penalty Invalid When Both Charges Are Clubbed- Concealment vs Inaccurate Particulars — ITAT Says AO Must Choose One, Not Both- ITAT Agra Deletes 271(1)(c)
Agra Tribunal deleted the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) relating to an addition of ₹4,25,000 made as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 towards share application money. AO, in both the assessment order & the penalty notice u/s 274, stated that the Assessee had “concealed income & furnished inaccurate particulars”, thereby invoking both limbs of section 271(1)(c). The quantum addition had al...
Author Info
