Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Awadhnarayan Bhagwanta Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Awadhnarayan Bhagwanta Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Payment Made Before Agreement Date – Stamp Duty Value Must Match Year of Agreement—ITAT Deletes Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)-  Property Booked in 2012, Taxed at 2017 Value—ITAT Corrects SDV Mismatch Assessee purchased a property for Rs.1,10,00,000/-, while stamp duty valuation as on 30.03.2017 was Rs.1,69,87,000/-. AO, in limited scrutiny, invoked u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) & added the differential Rs.59,87,000/. Before CIT(A), Assessee produced allotment letter dated 29.11.2012 issued by M/s Shah Housecon Pvt Ltd, advance payment of Rs.5,0...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930