Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Swamyraju Chandrashekar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Swamyraju Chandrashekar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Summary: The appellate authority held that the addition of ₹11,00,000 under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act for AY 2016-17 was unjustified. The assessee had deposited ₹11,00,000 in cash on 25 January 2016, claiming it was part of the sale proceeds of a property sold on 17 April 2015, with the cash component totaling ₹13,30,000. The AO rejected this explanation, citing the ten-month delay and presuming the funds were likely used for house construction. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. On appeal, the authority noted that suspicion or assump...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930