Case Law Details
Case Name : Swamyraju Chandrashekar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Swamyraju Chandrashekar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Summary: The appellate authority held that the addition of ₹11,00,000 under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act for AY 2016-17 was unjustified. The assessee had deposited ₹11,00,000 in cash on 25 January 2016, claiming it was part of the sale proceeds of a property sold on 17 April 2015, with the cash component totaling ₹13,30,000. The AO rejected this explanation, citing the ten-month delay and presuming the funds were likely used for house construction. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. On appeal, the authority noted that suspicion or assump...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


