Authorities found the land had been sold decades earlier and the MOU acknowledged no possession or rights. The Tribunal affirmed taxation under section 56. The ruling clarifies that an MOU cannot convert non-rights into capital receipts.
The reassessment was struck down as sanction was obtained from a Principal Commissioner instead of the competent authority under Section 151. Jurisdictional defect invalidated all subsequent proceedings.
The Tribunal held that a general survey admission by the seller cannot justify additions in every buyers case. Documentary proof of purchases and sales outweighed unsupported allegations.
The Tribunal held that an unsigned notice under Section 148 is invalid and does not confer jurisdiction on the Assessing Officer. Consequently, the entire reassessment and additions were quashed as void ab initio.
The Tribunal held that once reassessment is validly initiated, the Assessing Officer can tax any escaped income discovered later. Additions need not relate to the original reopening reason.
The Tribunal held that absence of a mandatory notice under Section 143(2) vitiates the entire reassessment. Participation by the assessee cannot cure a jurisdictional defect.
NGO Darpan creates a central identity for trusts and NGOs. A valid Darpan ID is now essential for grants, CSR funding, and FCRA compliance.
Consolidated GST notices are common but risky. Their validity depends on strict compliance with year-wise limitation and clear allegations for each period.
Section 194T mandates 10% TDS on salary, interest, and remuneration paid to partners. Firms must now deduct tax at source once partner-wise payments exceed Rs. 20,000 annually.
The Tribunal upheld that quarry expenses represented the cost of procuring raw material under a valid business arrangement. Denying such costs would lead to unrealistic profit margins.
