Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagmag Mercantiles Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jagmag Mercantiles Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Unsigned Section 148 Notice and No Failure to Disclose Facts: ITAT Kolkata Quashes Reopenings for Two Years The Kolkata Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 and quashed the reassessment proceedings on multiple jurisdictional grounds. First, the Tribunal found that the notice issued under section 148 was unsigned, neither digitally nor manually. Relying on binding precedents of the Bombay High Court (Prakash Krishnavtar Bhardwaj), Karnataka High Court (Panjos Builders), and the jurisdictional Calc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031