Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rupinder Kaur Arora Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rupinder Kaur Arora Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed for Non-Issuance of 143(2) – Jurisdictional Defect Cannot Be Cured by Participation The Delhi ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and quashed the reassessment for AY 2012-13 on the ground that no notice under Section 143(2) was ever issued, rendering the entire assessment without jurisdiction. The Tribunal found that neither the assessment order nor the NFAC order recorded any clear details regarding issuance of notice under Section 143(2), and the screenshots of the ITBA portal produced by the assessee showed issuance of notice ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930