Without purchases, there would have been no sales. AO’s claim of inflated purchases to reduce tax liability was not substantiated, as all 10 transactions of diamond purchase and sale were documented with relevant details.
Addition of Rs.10 Crore under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as Revenue failed to specify whether the addition was being made alleging concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
RP had excluded assessee from the COC as RP was empowered to decide about the status of a creditor as related party and the findings of RP and AA concluded assessee as related party in terms of provisions of Section 5 (24) of the Code.
Join our free webinar on Dec 21, 2024, at 10:30 AM to explore how a CFA charter can transform your finance career with global opportunities and expert guidance.
The assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. The assessee filed the return of income for AY 2015-16 on 30.11.2015 declaring a total income of Rs. 238,85,10,090/-.
Bombay High Court held that once application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme [SVLDR Scheme] for payment of duty was accepted, benefit of the scheme gets extended to the redemption fine also. Accordingly, petition allowed.
Understand the impact of changes in Table 8A of GSTR-9 for FY 2023-24. Learn about ITC double-counting issues and solutions for accurate GST reconciliation.
Supreme Court rules police officers filing false cases cannot claim protection under Section 197 CrPC. Lodging bogus cases is not part of official duty.
Bombay HC dismissed plea to quash FIR under SC/ST Act for slapping SC MP and uttering derogatory words in public, citing clear intent and evidence.
NCLAT Delhi held that provisions of section 43 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) cannot be attracted where no transaction was made by the Corporate Debtor.
