AO also held that despite issuing notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1), assessee did not comply with those, and AO made additions to the income found in the assessee’s account.
Assessee filed its return of income for the 2018-19 AY declaring a total of ₹12,33,640 and assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny on the issues of “imports and exports”, and various notices were issued and served upon assessee.
Calcutta High Court held that rejection of candidature not justified since rejection was without any basis and beyond the terms and conditions of brochure governing selection process initiated by IOC.
The return of the assessee was taken for scrutiny assessment. The assessee claimed Long Term Capital Gain on sale of land of Rs. 1,41,43,038/- and claimed exemption u/s. 54F of the Act reinvestment in a residential house.
The offences u/s. 419, 420, 467 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 are covered under the definition of schedule offences as per Sections 2(1)(x) and 2(1)(y) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
Two numbers of Writ Petitions were filed by the importer before the Hon’ble High Court of Rajasthan, challenging various notifications issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (‘DGFT’).
Reassessment order was set aside and remitted back to Respondent due to insufficient details in the assessment order on employee’s cash transactions.
Where secured creditor failed to pay the liquidation costs within 90 days after its intention to realize the security interest, the security interest should stand relinquished under Regulation 21A(3) of the Liquidation Regulations, 2016.
Held that in our view, two authorities have examined the facts and have given a finding of fact that the same Cenvat Credit was wrongly availed and passed on to the customer, and this has not been rebutted.
Calcutta High Court held that detention order under section 129(1) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 affirmed due to mismatch, coupled with a substantial gap between the declared and verified valuation, indicated a deliberate misrepresentation.
