Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Vs Varsha Bagri (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Suraksha Asset Reconstruction Ltd. Vs Varsha Bagri (NCLAT Delhi)

Conclusion: Where secured creditor failed to pay the liquidation costs within 90 days after its intention to realize the security interest, the security interest should stand relinquished under Regulation 21A(3) of the Liquidation Regulations, 2016.

Held: Appellant sought to realise its security interest under the SARFAESI Act in the liquidation process of the corporate debtor but the possession of the assets was denied by the liquidator despite an order passed by the Adjudicat

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31